Transcript
0:00   [Music]
0:00   here's Mary Galo good evening and
0:03   welcome to 16x9 the bigger picture you
0:06   can't see it you can't taste it but some
0:09   are calling it a serious health threat
0:11    every parent should know about WiFi
0:14   wireless internet is in schools Coast to
0:16   Coast but why do some kids say Wi-Fi is
0:19   making them sick in a 16x9 investigation
0:23   we put Wi-Fi to the test here's our
0:25   Carolyn
0:28   Jarvis they Gathering by the hundreds
0:31    hacking a public forum in Toronto
0:33   filling a school board meeting in
0:35   Peterboro I don't know what I'm going to
0:36   do if you if you have Wi-Fi in there I
0:38   just I can't I can't do this to my
0:40   daughter I cannot put her through this
0:42   experiment and assembling at a church in
0:44   Vancouver a fever pitch building over
0:47   what they see as a threat invisible to
0:49   the Eye Society in general uh doesn't
0:52   want to lose a convenience at the
0:54   expense of safety they're talking about
0:56   radiation exposure from Wi-Fi or
0:59   Wireless internet and their concern it's
1:02   making their kids sick I just think that
1:04   we don't know so why risk it today
1:07    schools across the country are rushing
1:09    to install it but these students say the
1:11     convenience isn't worth the risk I had
1:14    heart racing headaches nauseous it's a
1:17    really weird feeling weak and I'm really
1:20   shaky and when they're not at school
1:22   does it happen on the weekends no
1:24   there's no Rhyme or Reason to the
1:26   symptoms they range from headaches to
1:27   nausea heart palpitations even
1:30   rashes so 16x9 wanted to find out
1:34   exactly what if any threat exists in
1:36   schools so we went with this man
1:38   industry tester cavinder Dylan to
1:40   measure the radiation levels in a
1:42   typical Wireless classroom is it fair to
1:44   say that this would give us an average
1:45   sample size of what we'd be seeing in a
1:47   typical classroom um yes we're going to
1:50   be concentrating on this area so this
1:52   will basically be give us what the
1:54   proportional rate is to simulate an
1:55   actual classroom we set up each computer
1:57   to stream video constantly receiving
2:00   information from the devices that are
2:02   being uh set up right now and we got our
2:04   antennas uh hooked up and we're getting
2:06   the real life signals with the
2:07   correction factors from the antennas and
2:09   the cable losses right now we are
2:11    basically uh
2:13   113.8k
2:15   so in effect according to Health Canada
2:18   this classroom would be deemed safe um
2:20   according to the criteria yes so next we
2:22   go out into the hallway to check the
2:23   router one of several in the school
2:25   fixed to the ceiling the levels here hit
2:27   2600 microwatts 20 times the reading
2:31   inside the classroom people who are
2:32   actually in Industry who are testing
2:34   this they they they feel this is a high
2:36   limit this is this is very high really
2:39   you heard them our industry tester calls
2:41   that level high but it's still well
2:43   within Canada's safety guideline now
2:46   that guideline is a thing called Safety
2:48   Code 6 it sets the limit for radio
2:50   frequency radiation exposure and Health
2:53   Canada says there's no way the levels we
2:55   found are causing those headaches and
2:57   heart palpitations and Beth Peterson of
2:59   Health Canada says the science backs it
3:02   up there's no evidence scientific
3:04   evidence that those kind of effects are
3:06   caused by the energy um limits that kids
3:09   are exposed to by Wi-Fi Health Canada
3:11    sets the limit at 10 million microwatts
3:13   per meter squared now that might not
3:15   mean much to most of us but in 2008
3:18   Toronto's Board of Health said it's way
3:20   too high and asked Canada's Minister of
3:22   Health in this letter for much stricter
3:24   regulations a 100 times more strict
3:28   Health Canada never changed the thing
3:30   still no matter what any guideline says
3:32   these parents say they've seen it for
3:34   themselves and Wi-Fi is harming their
3:37   kids so she had to hold on to friends in
3:40   order not to collapse on the floor she
3:43   had headaches and we're not talking just
3:44   regular headaches they were extreme
3:45   headaches where the secretary would call
3:47   me I'd have to come pick her up
3:49   according to this doctor there's good
3:51   reason to believe these kids are telling
3:52   the truth and not just making up some
3:54   excuse to skip school there's no
3:56   question in my mind it exists Dr
3:58   Jennifer Armstrong specialized in
4:00   environmental medicine the big thing
4:02   with kids is they're more vulnerable why
4:04   children are more vulnerable their
4:05   skulls are thinner their their bodies
4:08   are not um as strong as ours in in
4:11    general they're developing their brains
4:13   are developing so you expose children to
4:17   radiation and their little bodies don't
4:19   handle it as well and cardiologist Dr
4:21   Steven Sinatra agrees as a parent if I
4:25   had a young child would I want to use my
4:27   child as an experiment to see if it's
4:28   going to take 30 years or 20 years or 10
4:30   years they become sick no not me but and
4:33   the thing is we have to sacrifice
4:35   accelerated education and convenience
4:38   and basically we have to look at the
4:40   safety of our children we have to do it
4:42   as a society well 16 by 9 wanted to test
4:45   the power of Wi-Fi so we went to visit
4:48   environmental scientist Magda Havis from
4:50   Trent University to do another test
4:53   Professor havas's subject Martin who
4:55   calls himself electrically sensitive is
4:57   hooked up to a heart monitor and Havis
4:59   sets up a wireless computer well what
5:01   we're going to be doing is we're going
5:02   to be taking Martin and exposing him to
5:06   microwave radiation from Wi-Fi the same
5:08   type of thing that we have in schools
5:09   for example and just monitoring his
5:11    heart to see if his heart reacts to any
5:13   of the radiation he won't know when
5:15   things are turned on or off so it's
5:16   going to be a blind study in that regard
5:18   with the Wi-Fi plugged in Martin's heart
5:20   rate accelerates in mere moments now I
5:23   can feel something it's going through my
5:26   chest I feel it down in my legs too the
5:29   closer the router is the greater his
5:31   reaction um a few seconds ago it was
5:33   like my chest was actually jumping in
5:36   the middle here then seconds after the
5:38   wireless internet is unplugged just like
5:41   that his heart rate slows down Martin
5:43   how are you feeling right now fine I
5:46   don't think there's anything on but
5:48   listen to this those levels Martin was
5:50   exposed to well they're acceptable
5:52   according to Safety Code six so if
5:54   they're safe why was his heart racing
5:57   Magda Havis has a theory so some
5:59   percentage of the population is reacting
6:02   to these microwave uh radiation at
6:05   levels well below Safety Code 6 but I'm
6:07   not sick from Wi-Fi and I use it all the
6:09   time well not everyone has the same
6:11    sensitivities we have children who have
6:12   peanut allergies we have uh people who
6:15   are allergic to uh pollen they react to
6:17   pollen and it's same with electrical
6:20   sensitivity only uh a percentage of the
6:22   population react still Health Canada
6:25   insists it's done its homework looked at
6:27   every bit of Science and that level of
6:28   radiation won't hurt anybody our safety
6:31   limits are set on we use a weight of
6:32   evidence approach so there are thousands
6:35   of Articles thousands of peer reviewed
6:38   scientific articles on the issue 16 by 9
6:41   wanted to take a look at that evidence
6:43   so we asked Health Canada for its science
6:45   they sent us this a list of 16 studies
6:49   entitled specific to Wi-Fi so we did our
6:51   own homework going through every study
6:54   and not a single one looks at whether
6:56   Wi-Fi in schools poses a health risk to
6:59   students
7:00   AA says since Health Canada isn't
7:02   controlling Wi-Fi parents are going to
7:04   have to so are you suggesting that
7:06   parents should tell their kids a
7:07   13-year-old or 14-year-old who may be
7:09   attached to his laptop or his iPad you
7:12   should stop using that it may not go
7:13   over so well but you know when children
7:15   want to smoke and if you're a
7:16   responsible parent you allow your your
7:17   13-year-old child to smoke in my mind
7:20   there's no difference between the two if
7:21   anything um I think maybe microwave
7:24   radiation is going to show up to be much
7:26   more harmful than smoking simply because
7:28   of the amount of of exposure that we're
7:30   we're seeing in our everyday environment
7:32   so how about the people who make these
7:34   products we asked to speak to Wi-Fi
7:36   manufacturers about the possible health
7:38   effects but they declined our request
7:40   for an interview the organization that
7:42   represents them the Wi-Fi Alliance did
7:45   however provide 16 x 9 with this written
7:47   statement Wi-Fi technology meets all
7:50   national and international safety
7:52   requirements and emits signals that are
7:54   typically hundreds to thousands of times
7:56   below the safety limits all well and
7:58   good but back in the schoolyard these
8:01   kids may have reason to wonder if it's
8:02   safe to go to school what do you want
8:04   done for them to turn it off do you feel
8:07   like there's anything you can do
8:10   no I'm pretty sure they won't listen to
8:12   us
8:14   kids as some schools in Canada race to
8:17   install Wi-Fi there are other schools
8:19   that are concerned about reports of
8:20   headaches hyperactivity and increased
8:23   heart rates in children should we be
8:25   concerned about Wireless technology and
8:28   what exactly does it admit
8:30   here again is our Carolyn
8:34   [Music]
8:35   Jarvis across the country these parents
8:38   teachers and experts are saying the same
8:41   thing there are children getting sick
8:43   and I don't think it's worth the risk I
8:45   really hate sending her to school given
8:48   the environment that she's in Wi-Fi is
8:50   toxic it's a different form of toxicity
8:52   but it's toxic to our bodies he would
8:54   often complain of heart palpitations or
8:57   chest pains i' start getting headaches
9:00   foggy vision and like just all weirded
9:04   out to expose my kids knowingly is very
9:08   frightening for me for me as a parent I
9:10   find it incredibly frustrating and scary
9:12   and sad that no one's even listening to
9:15   the concerns of the parents their
9:17   concern that radiation from Wireless
9:20   computers and this little Contraption
9:22   mounted in the hallways in classrooms of
9:24   schools can make students
9:26   sick it's Wi-Fi and health Canada says
9:29   there's no risk from the radiation it
9:31   emits that's just simply not true that's
9:34   simply not true Dr David Carpenter is a
9:36   world renowned expert in environmental
9:38   toxins in Albany New York and he says
9:41   the Canadian government is just plain
9:43   wrong what we do is look at the weight
9:46   of the evidence but that's what they
9:47   said they did they didn't the weight of
9:49   the evidence demonstrates clearly that
9:53   exposure to radio frequency radiation
9:55   the causes disease the evidence is
9:58   strongest for cancer cancer caused by
10:00  Wi-Fi emissions certainly doesn't add up
10:03  with health Canada's insistence that
10:05  Wi-Fi is safe so you're saying that
10:07  their science is faulty or their
10:08  analysis of the science is faulty their
10:10  science is faulty and certainly their
10:12  analysis is faulty you can selectively
10:14  look at at literature but there's been
10:18  evidence for harmful effects of
10:21  Microwave Radio Frequency Radiation for
10:24  30 or 40 years why choose to ignore that
10:27  how does that possibly benefit them
10:30  when you acknowledge you have a problem
10:33  and you're a government agency you have
10:34  to do something about
10:37  it Canada's government might not be
10:39  doing anything about concerns but in
10:41   France the town of Arville St Clair is
10:45   it's the first municipality in the world
10:47   to remove Wi-Fi from schools and public
10:52   buildings mayor rodolph tamas says he's
10:54   taking a precautionary approach because
10:56   he's not willing to gamble with the
10:58   health of children here
10:59   so this town that 10 years ago went
11:01    Wireless ahead of everyone else became
11:04    in April of 2009 the first to shut it
11:09    down Wi-Fi is an important tool he says
11:12     but there are places it simply shouldn't
11:14    be like schools so now all but two
11:17    schools here are Wi-Fi free and the town
11:20   plans to strip Wi-Fi from all its public
11:22    buildings by the end of the
11:27    year but a reveal s isn't returning to
11:30   the Dark Ages in fact it's once again on
11:33   The Cutting Edge of Technology it's
11:35   installed a state-of-the-art fiber optic
11:38   system that's faster more stable and
11:40   according to the people here safer aen
11:44   sander leads an awareness group against
11:46   Wireless Technologies people could see
11:49   that they were victims that it was not
11:51    that innocuous that some people really
11:53   suffered from this so it started a real
11:55   interrogation among the public and
11:57   people said that well if it's not
11:59   absolutely necessary why should we uh
12:01   use the thing and parents around here
12:03   are applauding the
12:06   change she says removing Wi-Fi is a good
12:09   thing for
12:10   [Applause]
12:12   students and while other European
12:14   countries might not be pulling Wi-Fi
12:16   they are taking a stand in 2007 Germany
12:19   recommended children limit their use of
12:21   Wi-Fi uncertain of its long-term effects
12:24   and in Britain a handful of public
12:26   schools decided independently to remove
12:28   it
12:29   but back in Canada there's no
12:31   precautionary approach Wi-Fi is going up
12:33   not coming down leaving students like
12:36   McKenzie honing with no good option go
12:38   to school and feel sick it's just kind
12:40   of weird it felt like my heart skipping
12:42   beats or don't go to school at all I
12:45   noticed that every time I like came home
12:47   for the weekend it start to get better
12:48   and by Sunday I'd feel normal no like
12:51    headaches or anything like that well
12:52   this is the petition MacKenzie's mom
12:54   Linda is fed up waiting for the
12:56   government to change its mind so she
12:58   started her own campaign hopeful more
13:01   parents will join her we don't have 10
13:03   years on this issue because the exposure
13:06   of radiation for the kids is is harmful
13:08   environmental health expert Dr Carpenter
13:11    says it's time we stop turning a blind
13:13   eye to the risk when you look at the
13:15   guidelines that have been put in place
13:16   by Health Canada do they go far enough
13:18   to protecting Canadians they certainly
13:21   do not these guidelines are based on a
13:24   fallacy a fallacy that according to Dr
13:27   Carpenter is putting children Children
13:29   at Risk it's appropriate for parents to
13:33   demand that Wi-Fi not be placed in
13:35   school not because we have proof at this
13:40   stage that it's harming the children but
13:43   because we have absolutely no evidence
13:46   that it's safe contrary to what any
13:48   government agency says and not heeding
13:51    the warnings of experts like Dr
13:53   Carpenter is leaving students like
13:55   Jeremiah feeling helpless I really am
13:57   nervous I don't really like school no
13:59   more do you used to like school I used
14:01   to love it I'd get mad if I missed a day
14:05   Dr Carpenter warns there may be many Mis
14:07   days or worse for students like Jeremiah
14:10   if change doesn't come soon you don't
14:13   want to wait until you can count the
14:15   bodies before you tell the public that
14:18   there is a serious potential of
14:21   harm and with regard to the issue of
14:24   Wi-Fi in schools this is exactly where
14:27   we are
14:28   [Music]