Wi-Fi Health Risk Advisory:
Safety Standards Missing Critical Data

Wi-Fi Health Risk Advisory: Safety Standards Missing Critical Data

By Curtis Bennett

April 7, 2011

Here is a picture of unknown origin showing a classroom with 20 students, 3 teachers and 20 computers. You can see the computers aren't using wires to log onto the internet. Wi-Fi routers are supplying the room with the required frequency to communicate with all of the computers. Here is your wireless quiz:

Wi-Fi Health Risk Advisory

What is the total number wireless devices in the room interacting with Wi-Fi frequency?

A) 20

B) 23

C) 43

You would be surprised how many professionals got this question wrong. Here is a PDF to show you what was missed in the Wi-Fi discussion, and there are 2 reports on the safety of Wi-Fi that also missed the question above. One from BC CDC and the other from Ontario checking Simcoe County Schools.

Here is the Health Advisory showing Wi-Fi is not safe and illegal with the reported error or omission in safety standards. 

The Specific Absorption Rate adopted for testing the limits of human exposure is a plastic model with liquid in it and never has adverse health effects. There is nothing biological about the test, it is baseless science based on whether water molecules heat. The report  was done by Tony Muc, Chief Physicist and an author of Safety Code 6. Tony makes a ridiculous analogy referring to a stove element. Is the child getting close enough to the laptop to be burned?? As a physicist, he is not qualified in an electrical opinion and he admitted he consulted with no electrical professionals in his reporting.

If the Wi-Fi frequencies are 2.4 GHz, that is 2.4 billion cycles per second. It means the EMFs are expanding and collapsing inside the children, teachers, building materials including fire separations 4.8 billion times per second. Currents are being induced and the high speed polarization billions of times per second at atomic or molecular levels will rip anything apart. The higher the power density, the bigger the electrical load absorbed and the expansion and collapsing of the EMFs will be more powerful.

It requires investigation and explanation how children can be electrocuted slowly by being in an electrical circuit while they are graded on their intelligence. There are real reasons the world is wired and it is to keep everything out of the circuit.

Every computer station needs to be hard wired, it is the missed economy. Wireless gives the illusion of savings, the offset costs and liabilities will be off the charts.
"Technological upgrades are important in education but upgrades have to be done properly to ensure public safety. Wi-Fi in schools allows the use of laptops without wires, is convenient and saves on construction costs associated with wiring computer stations. In determining Wi-Fi safety in schools, all electrical devices and EMF's have to be considered. All of the electrical devices and electrical considerations will be numbered below for simplicity in referencing . . .

"Attached to this Advisory are two reports on Wi-Fi safety in schools, authored by Randy Ross of BC CDC & Tony Muc. Both reports are incomplete and inaccurate because all interactions were not considered. Health Canada's Safety Code 6 is specific that unintentional stimulation of tissue is to be avoided as experimental studies have shown it can lead to nerve and muscle depolarization. Wi-Fi is illegal because it is causing the unintentional stimulation of tissue. This qualified error has been reported to Health Canada & Canadian Parliament. Immediate action is required to protect children from this danger in schools."

Curtis Bennett
Director of Operations
Chief Science Officer
Interprovincial Journeyman Electrician(Red Seal)
Engineering Technologist
Adjunct Faculty, IHF & GEDI
Thermografix Consulting Corporation
Bookmark and Share

Former Professor Curtis Bennett



Educational and Informational Purposes: All information on this site and all links that are linked to from StayOnTheTruth.com represent solely the opinions of their producers.

This information and links to more information are made available to you as a resource for your own research and evaluation not as an endorsement.

StayOnTheTruth.com is not in the business of persuading you or anyone else to believe anything that that is presented linked to from this site; however, it does encourage you to use all available resources to form your own judgement about very important things that affect your life.

Fair Dealing and Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair dealing' or 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in copyright law. In accordance with the Fair Dealing or Fair Use intention, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair dealing' or 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.

All work from Former Professor Curtis Bennett, Thermoguy.com is reproduced and distributed
with permission and is not to be represented, misrepresented, reproduced and/or
distributed anywhere else without written permission.

© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved. "Stay On The Truth", Dianne Knight