Response To Health Canada on W.H.O. IARC Report Linking Cell Phones To Cancer

Response To Health Canada on W.H.O. IARC Report Linking Cell Phones To Cancer
by Adjunct Professor Curtis Bennett
June 19, 2011
There isn’t one person responsible for our blog opinions, there are many groups of supporting professionals. The importance of passing off qualified, objective science can’t be overstated or effective policy would never happen. ANY professional or group of professionals that lose objectivity or sell their opinion has no right to call themselves a professional and they should lose their credentials. Policy is based on science, not the other way around.

This blog is about administrative negligence, don’t care why or who does it because they will answer for themselves. The problem in this case is an administration didn’t do their job as the law dictated except this hurts people, animals, pollinators and the ecosystems that sustain all life on the planet.

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer reported a “possible” link between cell phones and cancer. The word “possible” leave lots of argument for lawyers for the telecommunications industry.

What the W.H.O. didn’t know at the time of their reporting is that the mechanism or link had been found and reported to Health Canada as well as Canadian Parliament as the reporting profession’s jurisdictional authority. It was Health Canada’s job to report that mechanism as the authority and as defined in law. They didn’t report and as a result created an administrative nightmare with that negligence. Here is a link to a letter faxed to Health Canada on their negligence.

The World Health Organization reports Glioma as the cancer associated with cell phone use. Follow that link so you can hear about a very aggressive brain cancer. You and your children are not supposed to hold radiating devices next to your head, you aren’t wired for those frequencies.

When you hear reporting professionals talking about cell phones not causing problems, ask them about their electrical credentials because doctors, physicists, MSc, accountants, administrators, etc. aren’t qualified to understand the frequency mechanism. Reporting without the required electrical professionals is inaccurate and incomplete.

Here is another link to show you an infrared image of before and after cell phone use; see any differences? Men need to look at the images of the radiation and think about that cell phone in your pocket next to your testicles. Follow the links on the page.

Don’t use cordless phones, wireless baby monitors or other wireless devices without consideration for the nerve problems that are reported. Humans aren’t wired for these frequencies and there will be serious consequences. Here is a link to a publication released on June 16, 2011 on much slower EMFs causing DNA Collapse.

Adjunct Professor Curtis Bennett

Bookmark and Share

Educational and Informational Purposes: All information on this site and all links that are linked to from represent solely the opinions of their producers.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other person or any agency or any entity.

This information and links to more information are made available to you as a resource for your own research and evaluation not as an endorsement. is not in the business of persuading you or anyone else to believe anything that that is presented or linked to from this site; however, it does encourage you to use all available resources to form your own judgement about very important things that affect your life.

Fair Dealing and Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair dealing' or 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in copyright law. In accordance with the Fair Dealing or Fair Use intention, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair dealing' or 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.

© Copyright 2023. All Rights Reserved. "Stay On The Truth", Dianne Knight