Professionals Speaking Over Expertise on EMF Exposure Undermines Universities, Medicine, All Jurisdictions Creating Catastrophic Liability Regardless of Intent

Exclusive Quotation

Checkmate is coming NOW!

~ Curtis Bennett
March 18, 2019


By Curtis Bennett


March 18, 2019

The mass deployment of smart meters, Wi-Fi, cell phones, tablets, blanketing the planet from the surface of the planet and from space has catastrophic consequences and liability. There are very real reasons we wire the world. Billions of lost economy in construction wiring computer stations. It is safe and very fast where Wi-Fi in a classroom as an example requires putting children, teachers, parents, support staff, buildings inside the wireless electrical circuit. These EMFs are not supposed to hit or interact with any of the above.

To have global exposure codes admit critical science was missing on a very complex topic created bigger problems. Industries were created selling products on how to live in the microwave. Due the electrical mechanisms not being qualified, people were considered sensitive or microwave sickness when in reality it is subtle electrocution for biology.

Trying to explain or qualify credentials pertaining to EMF exposure has been ongoing. The unfortunate domino effect is 8 years of electromagnetic radiation that didn’t have to happen. Political and special interests took precedence over the public they were elected to represent. The technical reality is these EMFs have been absorbed, oscillate, vibrated or reflected billions of times per measurable second, 86,400 times per day for 2920 days.

Elected representatives are elected to represent and administer the government. That includes codes, standards, education, medicine, police, fire, military and all services. Education is specific to training and certifying sciences as well as other professionals. Those professionals do their jobs without any compromises or there are consequences and liability.
It WAS specifically causation, biological plausibility, mechanism of interaction and action that were admitted to be missing in global exposure codes. That is why the Auditor General of Canada and Environment Commissioner sent us all the petitions on EMFs. PhD’s reporting is specific to the health effects which is a mechanism of action, NOT the mechanisms of interaction CAUSING the mechanisms of action.

You can’t causally represent EMFs, it requires a qualified electrical interpretation by electrical professionals that work in that area of electricity. There are many different types of electrical expertise. Red Seal Interprovincial Journeyman mean credentials recognized across Canada for the utilization of ALL electricity. If electricity is used anywhere, we are the experts.

The causal evidence linking EMFs to adverse health effects and more was found and reported September 14, 2010. It went to all levels of Canadian Governments including Prime Minister Harper. October 26, 2010, expert witness was provided to Canadian Parliaments Standing Committee on Health at their request.

The same causal and biological plausibility linking EMFs to adverse health was qualified for lecture in accredited medical education. January 7&8, 2011 the causal evidence linking EMFs to adverse health effects was lectured for education credits required for ongoing medical licensing. That was applicable to health professionals in North America for ongoing medical licensing.

Dr. Magda Havas was invited to submit a lecture at that highest accredited level. Her Environmental Petition to the Environment Commissioner showed the horrific damage caused by a cordless phone. Health Canada talked around her questions and she couldn’t qualify the power density differences. Dr. Havas was a no show and never heard from her again. That explains her getting retained endorsing filters or as as an “expert” when she is over her head on the electrical interpretation.

The World Health Organization reported RF EMFs as “possibly” carcinogenic May, 2011. Had PM Harper done his job and informed the W.H.O., EMFs would be a group 1 carcinogen.

It wasn’t know that citizen groups and their networks has mass emailed telling them to ignore Professor Bennett. According to them, a professor had to represent a theory, get a PhD, get their doctorate and teach a course at a university. Bennett being a professor for accredited medical education programs applicable across North America for health professionals may be because electricity isn’t a theory, neither is engineering, radiation or medicine.

Citizen groups and others private messaged others dismissing Bennett’s input without challenge. Bachelor of Art student C. Martin was relentless without understanding there are no art students superseding science departments. CST in British Columbia collected donations for a lawsuit and retained a lawyer for the legal action. The lawyer was offered the causal evidence to stop smart meters; he had been told to ignore Bennett because they didn’t like him. Their lawyer left the BCUC hearings during Bennett’s cross examination of FortisBC’s experts getting them to admit the causal evidence. CST medical expert witnesses were effectively dismissed by the BCUC and CST class action lawsuit failed because of causal evidence missing. CST hired PhDs who qualified couldn’t qualify electrical interactions.

March 13, 2019 Joel Moskowitz did a presentation for UC Berkeley. The mechanisms of interaction linking RF EMFs to adverse health effects was not mentioned for reasons Mr. Moskowitz can explain. He was privy to all Bennett’s postings as were others.

California had wildfires last year that devastated areas and ecosystems. Utilities were blamed for starting the fires when that isn’t the reality. Here is a parallel to the Camp fires and others that happened August, 2003 in British Columbia, Canada. None of the people had to die in California or the damage. This isn’t a reflection of the first responders; fighting those fire blind cost them live [life].

Wildfires were out of control with terrain and smoke affecting fighting the fires. Every offer to assist with the fire giving unobstructed sight through smoke was turned away. August 21, 2003 the fire was going to interface with Kelowna BC where 1000s were waiting for evacuation orders. All staring off into the smoke with no idea of the hell coming. Action had to be taken and was by flagging down patrolling police showing them the fire was there. That initiated the evacuation of 15,000 and the next day another 15,000. Here is one image of what was seen through smoke.
Forest Fire Interfacing with Kelowna BC
After being directed by police to volunteer at the fire hall, this collage of images was taken.

BC 2003 Forest Fire Public Inquiry Edited;
California, Alberta, BC, etc. Fighting Fires Blind in 2019

This email was sent to Joel Moskowitz and UC Berkley responding to the great presentation done that excluded the causal evidence needed to stop smart meter roll outs, Wi-Fi and the radiation of the planet. It has been 5 days and no response from Joel or UC Berkeley.

Here is the email and the response.
Curtis Bennett
Joel Moskowitz
Professor Curtis Bennett

Chief, International Science Advisory Board for IHF(14,000 members),
Adjunct Professor for Accredited Medical Education For CME Credits,
Thermal Radiation Consultant for 40 Years,
Interprovincial Journeyman Electrician(Red Seal),
Building Construction Engineering Technologist
Joel Moskowitz,
Director at UC Berkeley Center for
Family and Community Health
Photo Credit: LinkedIn

“Cell Phones, Cell Towers, and Wireless Safety”
(UC Berkeley Presentation)

Ed Friedman    Mar 13, 2019, 8:47 PM (5 days ago)    
to Ed
Good presentation

From: Joel MOSKOWITZ []
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 3:58 PM
Subject: “Cell Phones, Cell Towers, and Wireless Safety” (UC Berkeley Presentation)

“Cell Phones, Cell Towers, and Wireless Safety” (UC Berkeley Presentation)

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety

March 13, 2019

On February 27, 2019, Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., delivered the keynote presentation, “Cell Phones, Cell Towers & Wireless Safety” for the “Balancing Technology” series offered by University Health Services (UHS) at the University of California, Berkeley. The presentation provides a nontechnical overview of wireless radiation research and policy developments including 5G.

Dr. Moskowitz, director of the UC Berkeley Center for Family and Community Health, has been translating and disseminating the research on wireless radiation health effects since 2009. His Electromagnetic Radiation Safety website initiated in 2013 has had more than two million page views by visitors from over 200 countries.

The presentation was filmed by UHS and by CNBC. The event was co-sponsored by the UC Berkeley School of Public Health.

The video, slides, and safety tips can be viewed at the following link: or

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety


Twitter:            @berkeleyprc

Curtis Bennett
Curtis Bennett <>    
to jmm, telltang, Ed
Mar 14, 2019, 1:25 PM  
Subject: Professor Curtis Bennett Here On Presentations Leaving Out Critical Causation Evidence Linking EMFs to Adverse Health

Hello Joel,

I can't imagine what got lost in translation that you would ignore me in my qualified electrical/engineering/radiation/medical capacity. You had access to everything posted on Facebook by our team including accredited medical education applicable to EVERY health professional in your state and country. That includes being applicable to your university. I am not singular nor am I selling anything; it was our team that found/reported and lectured the missing causal evidence missing in exposure codes from the beginning. I provided expert witness pertaining to causation and biological plausibility for Canadian Parliament's Standing Committee on Health at their request.

I am chief of an international science advisory board with 14,000 members that put on Continuing Medical Education programs applicable to the millions of health professionals in North America. After testifying for Parliament, I contacted health education admin in regards to an accredited medical education program pertaining to the causal evidence for medical professionals. Once you mention the accreditation to health professionals, there is no higher standard and it would be immediately recognized by your university or others. Here is a letter by health education admin; please contact them and have candid conversations.

Health admin asked me to suggest a professional to submit a presentation for lecture and I suggested Dr. Magda Havas [PhD]. She is a professor teaching biology at Trent University in Canada and the accredited program validated what she was reporting on health effects. Health admin contacted Havas and called me saying she wanted to see my credentials. I said share them and Havas was a no show for that causal evidence. I didn't know Havas was selling or promoting filters or technologies as well as herself as an expert. A professor teaching biology isn't supposed to overwhelmed by a plastic head or a potato representing biology.

I have heard and seen emails where CST [Citizens for Safe Technology] and others sent out emails telling their networks to ignore me. Josh Del Sol referred to me as a mad dog. Liz Barris, Kevin Mottus, Anura Lawson and others in California were given the causal evidence. I heard they interpreted me to soften the approach. Olga Sheean was given the causal evidence and I spent significant time at no cost for her presentation. Her presentation left out 100% of what was given to her and zero reference to causal evidence. That denied her audience and governing bodies the causal evidence they were looking for. I had Bachelor of Art graduates questioning how I could be a professor without a PhD or doctorate degree and which university the program was recognized in? I explained that electricity, radiation, engineering and medical education isn't a theory. I gave them the same letter letter above to contact health admin and no response. Dafna Tachover is a lawyer and should understand the basics of causal evidence. Her website We Are The Evidence is representing the mechanisms of action but not the mechanisms of interaction.

All of your hard work, Barrie Trower, Olle [Johansson], David Carpenter, [Andrew] Goldsworthy, Martin Paul, Sam Milham, etc. ignored. While all of you were reporting the mechanisms of action, the mechanisms of interaction have to be qualified. That requires a qualified electrical interpretation first: How are they hit, why do some feel it, symptoms across the board. The fact the language using thermal and non thermal is even used is garbage. It is all thermal above Absolute Zero(-273 deg C or -496 deg F). Our team has a 40 year radiation background troubleshooting at atomic and molecular levels for every industry, government and their insurers. We have imaged EMF interaction creating a catastrophic problem at 60 Hz. Thermal Radiation is the natural vibrations and frequencies of ALL matter above Absolute Zero.

Did you represent to Berkeley Health Department medical diagnosis has changed with EMF exposure putting every doctor in the US in a malpractice lawsuit? Did you represent all buildings are no longer compliant with Building Code or Nuclear Failure Within your Borders? Did you share the reality EVERY science has changed and their Degree no longer applicable? Do you have any engineering departments and architecture? Did you represent not one of those people in California had to die in those fires and EMFs contributing? The mudslides washing babies away and the hell going on? We trained fire departments 27 years ago to see through smoke; thermal gradients can be seen. Did you represent our qualifying for RFK Jr.'s article on nerves of young people electrically short circuiting killing them dead? Are the dead children just sensitive where Josh del Sol can recommend a Building Biologist to teach you how to live in the microwave? Did you represent Boeing engineers using potatoes for Wi-Fi safety on airplanes? Does that biologically represent people?

Did you represent all buildings in California with smart meters are no longer compliant with code and the installation is illegal and an immediate fire hazard as well? That includes the university as well as infrastructure. The Specific Absorption Rate test name is an admission of harm. There is no acceptable absorption or dosage of electromagnetic radiation.

How long can you put a baby in a microwave for?

I have a quadruple science background and NEVER speak over expertise specific to liability. Boeing engineers are smart; radiating people on aircraft including crew has liability. We were given the criteria to reverse smart meter programs; we have to PROVE PUCs made an error. Now the PUCs, utilities, FCC and industry have to qualify a potato and plastic head as science. First response professionals have a duty; I am not trying to hurt feelings, this is to save lives and avoid liability.

I have to forward this to your health department or be liable. Don't stop the important work but you have other applicable departments that can help you.


Professor Curtis Bennett

Chief, International Science Advisory Board for IHF(14,000 members)
Adjunct Professor for Accredited Medical Education For CME Credits
Thermal Radiation Consultant for 40 Years
Interprovincial Journeyman Electrician(Red Seal)
Building Construction Engineering Technologist
Ph: 604-239-2694

Copyright © 2019 Thermoguy. All rights reserved.

Editor's Note

Stay On the Truth, by Dianne Knight, is the only media in the world that Professor Curtis Bennett is talking to, the ONLY ONE who responded.

Former Professor Curtis Bennett

Bookmark and Share

Educational and Informational Purposes: All information on this site and all links that are linked to from represent solely the opinions of their producers.

This information and links to more information are made available to you as a resource for your own research and evaluation not as an endorsement. is not in the business of persuading you or anyone else to believe anything that that is presented linked to from this site; however, it does encourage you to use all available resources to form your own judgement about very important things that affect your life.

Fair Dealing and Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair dealing' or 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in copyright law. In accordance with the Fair Dealing or Fair Use intention, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair dealing' or 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.

All work from Former Professor Curtis Bennett, is reproduced and distributed
with permission and is not to be represented, misrepresented, reproduced and/or
distributed anywhere else without written permission.

© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved. "Stay On The Truth", Dianne Knight