Letter to FortisBC CEO, Mark Warren, BC Hydro, etc. on Smart Meter Program Being Stopped and Reversed.

April 17, 2016
By Curtis Bennett

Our jobs as consulting professionals using codes/standards is to get the job done as trained and qualified professionals. We look to our authorities to report something or to address a code ruling, we don’t have personal opinions. 100% of our work is science.

Policy is based on science not politics and there are never circumstances where we are lobbied to compromise our work or we would be liable as well as lose our credentials. When it came to RF EMF exposure, it was alarming to see the depth of special interests taking precedence over the tax paying public relying on our governments to do their job. The unfortunate result has been taxpayers funding their own subtle electrocution, adverse health effects, ecocide and unrealized damage to buildings as well as infrastructure.

In 2010 when asked to look at WiFi in schools, we didn’t technically know what was being done in schools. The second we heard of a router covering a classroom to communicate with laptops, it was immediately said you can’t do that. You are putting the children teachers, support staff as well as buildings inside an electrical circuit or man made microwave oven. Looking at Health Canada’s Safety Code 6(2009) was alarming as it admitted to inducing currents(electrocution). Page 9 of Safety Code 6 admitted causation and biological plausibility was missing linking the RF EMFs to adverse health effects. Safety Code 6(2009) stated they would amend the code when they received peer reviewed science showing adverse health effects.

The strength of exposure codes is that these RF EMFs are not supposed to hit people. That is why cause was missing because of the science industry was using for the limits of human exposure. Lots of people including me have put a cup of water in a microwave or heated up a drink. The science the wireless industry and governments were using are based on a cup of water in a microwave except the test model is shaped like a head instead of a cup.

The bottom line is the plastic head is placed in a RF EMF sterile environment to test cell phones that cell phone manufacturers have to submit for testing. Here is a picture of the test model and remember that the phone isn’t communicating with any antennas or network. See the bracket that holds the phone away from the head as per manufacturer specifications? The higher power density was measured at the base of the antenna on the phone and it was thought a small localized area in the skull was heated.

Exponent Inc. The Specific Absorption Rate Test left out the antennas, WiFi Router and the Smart Grid required to communicate with smart meters. As soon as you add the antennas, routers and grid, you have cause missing in exposure codes. Directly below is BC Hydro’s diagram of their smart grid for smart meters. The diagram shows what the Specific Absorption Rate Test left out and it is BC Hydro showing how people are hit and hurt. This is why they were warned specific to liability which will include criminal charges. BC Hydro needs to stop their smart meter program immediately and arrange through electrical workers to re-inspect and maintain 1.9 million meter bases. Then they have to replace the wireless meter with approved meters without RF EMF capabilities. There is zero margin of error and those that do not do their job will be liable including criminally for their assault with this deadly weapon as applied.

Can you see why Biological Plausibility was missing in Safety Code 6? The plastic head doesn’t have any biology. Directly below are accurate infrared images of cell phone use after 1 hour, can you see if there are any differences and is a small area of the skull only affected?